May 29th 2015

Progressives Have Won the Battle for the Soul for the Democratic Party

by Robert Creamer

Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist and author of the recent book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win," available on amazon.com.


".....by and large, the battle for control for the ideological center of the Democratic Party has been settled – and it is likely that Hilary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren were never the real protagonists."

"The only area of major policy division in the Democratic Party today is trade, and even there most of the Democratic Party has united around a consensus position that is very skeptical of trade deals.....".


There has been a flurry of recent commentary about the “battle” between the Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren wings of the Democratic Party – a supposed contest for the Party’s soul.
 
But by and large, the battle for control for the ideological center of the Democratic Party has been settled – and it is likely that Hilary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren were never the real protagonists.
 
There are still pro-Wall Street, corporatist – and even socially conservative --elements in the Democratic coalition.   But the center of the Party has consolidated around progressive principles as never before with respect to economic, social and foreign policy.
 
There may be some differences in style and emphasis, but it’s hard to tell the difference between a Clinton speech and a Warren speech when it comes to most economic questions – and particularly when it comes to the overarching narrative.
 
There is increasing consensus in the Democratic Party leadership and rank and file with respect to the reasons why the incomes of ordinary Americans have flat-lined even though the economy has grown.
 
And there is increasing consensus in the Democratic Party with respect to the solutions.
 
You might summarize the emerging Democratic economic consensus something like this:
 
Since the disastrous Great Recession, our economy has been going in the right direction under President Obama’s leadership, but we need to make sure that average Americans benefit when it grows.
 
That means that we have to reform government so that it works for average Americans, not wealthy special interests.
 
Too many politicians have given in to the power of lobbyists for big business and the wealthy, and changed the rules to make it easier for companies to lay off workers, get rid of unions, raid pension funds, ship jobs overseas, and keep wages low. 
 
Corporate CEO’s and billionaires keep getting new tax breaks, while average Americans struggle to provide for their families.  Ordinary people have seen their incomes flat-line because politicians have stacked the deck against middle class people in favor of the rich.  As a result CEO’s who used to make 20 times what they paid their workers and not make almost 300 times what they pay their workers.  And the Wall Street bankers and speculators continue to get bigger and bigger bonuses – even though the recklessness of the big Wall Street banks wrecked the economy and caused the Great Recession.
 
Instead, our government we should focus on improving the incomes of average Americans, not creating loopholes and subsidies for big corporations. If you work hard and play by the rules in this country, you should be paid enough to live on and support your family, and retire securely.  A thriving middle class isn’t just the result of a strong economy – it builds a strong economy.  When average people have money in their pockets, we are able to support local businesses and the economy grows.
 
We should use tax dollars to build roads and create jobs, instead of tax breaks for millionaires.
 
And we should get big money out of politics – government should help level the playing field, not rig the system for the powerful.
 
That’s a powerful narrative and it isn’t just supported by most Democrats – it is resonant with most Americans.
 
The same goes for social policy.  Twenty years ago issues like immigration reform, reproductive choice, gun violence, gay marriage – even civil rights -- were wedge issues inside the Democratic Party.   No longer.
 
Today banners supporting immigration reform, abortion rights, gay marriage and voting rights are proudly displayed at Democratic Conventions.   Instead these issues are all wedge issues inside the Republican Party.
 
And the same can be said for foreign policy.  No serious leader of the Democratic Party supports another ground war in the Middle East.   There is virtual unanimity that the Iraq War was a horrible mistake that kicked over the sectarian hornets’ nest and created the conditions leading to the problems we have today – especially the rise of ISIL.
 
The only area of major policy division in the Democratic Party today is trade, and even there most of the Democratic Party has united around a consensus position that is very skeptical of trade deals that increase the power of large corporations and drag down the wages of American workers.
 
In fact, in the last 30 years, we have rarely seen such consensus on policy inside the Democratic Party – and the progressive coalition at its core.   One reason is that most Americans when asked agree with virtually all of these positions.
 
The Democratic economic narrative outpolls the Republican narrative almost two to one.  The same is true for virtually every one of these positions.
 
But if that’s true, why do Republicans control both Houses of Congress?  Why is the Presidential race still a contest in 2016?
 
The answer is that while Democrats clearly reflect the positions of most of the American electorate, Republicans have three critical structural advantages.
 
To take back Congress, win the Presidency and create the progressive future that is supported by most Americans, Democrats must first minimize or eliminate each of those structural advantages over the next two years – and the next 10 years.
 
The Big Three
 
1). Turn Out.  Republicans have a distinct structural advantage when it comes to turnout.  Republican base voters are generally more upscale economically than base Democratic voters.  That makes them more likely to turn out to the polls – especially in Mid-Terms. 
 
A portion of that advantage has been neutralized by far superior Democratic field operations – especially in Presidential years. 
 
Part of the advantage will also be overcome by demographics.  GOP base voters skew older, whiter and less urban.  Younger millennial voters are substantially more prone to vote Democratic than older voters.  The same is true of non-white and urban voters as a whole. 
 
These groups – and especially Hispanics and other recent immigrant groups – are growing every year as a percentage of the population while GOP base voter cohorts are shrinking.
 
But in the end, Democrats must focus on energizing and motivating these base voters.   There is no more important task for ensuring that the progressive consensus is actually converted into progressive policy.
 
2). Redistricting.  From 2000 on, Republicans did a much better job than Democrats addressing the nuts and bolts of redistricting.
 
They focused in on winning key state legislative contests and the governor’s mansions of important swing states.  As a result, by 2012 in many states substantially more voters supported Democratic candidates for Congress, but the shape of the newly-drawn Congressional Districts gave many more seats to Republicans than Democrats. 
 
Democrats can’t afford to let this happen again.  That’s why former Congressman Mark Schauer has been appointed to what amounts to redistricting Czar of the Democratic Party to muster all of our resources and focus our energies on preparing for the next redistricting battle following the 2020 census.
 
In the meantime we must challenge unfair districts in court – especially pursuing civil rights claims.  And we must press for passage of an improved Voting Rights Act that can help undo some of the damage done by unfairly drawn Congressional and legislative maps.
 
3). Big Money.  The Supreme Court’s Citizens United Decision gives a huge structural advantage to the .001%’s attempts to prevent the enactment of progressive policies and move America back to the Gilded Age. 
 
That in turn mightily benefits the GOP. 
 
Ending this structural advantage will ultimately require one of two developments:
 
·      Passage of a Constitutional Amendment of the sort endorsed by Hillary Clinton, or;
·      Appointment of new Supreme Court justices that will reverse Citizens United.
 
Until one of these two things occurs, Democrats must take action to ameliorate and offset this critical GOP structural advantage.
 
The continued development of robust on-line small donor fundraising operations is the most important means available.  Almost three-fourths of the Obama Campaign’s billion dollar budget came from small on-line donors.
 
Passage of a bill to amplify small donations with federal matching for candidates that eschew large donor fundraising would also massively change the playing field.
 
Finally, the cultivation of progressive large donor fundraising – work that is going on through the Democracy Alliance and Committee on the States – is crucial.
 
At the same time Democrats work to neutralize and limit the impact of the big three GOP structural advantages, our most powerful weapon is the fact that most Americans agree with Democratic values and policy priorities.  And the last thing we need to do is back away from them, or “moderate” our positions.
 
Progressive Democratic priorities are the priorities of most ordinary Americans.  
 
Standing up straight for those progressive principles – and passionately advocating them -- is also the best way to mobilize our voters to go out and vote.  And we have to remember that in discussing those principles we must always talk about our values -- not mainly policies and programs but right and wrong.
 
And of course we have to remember that voters ultimately cast their ballots for people – real flesh and blood candidates, not policies and programs – not even progressive principles.
 
Democrats need to support, cultivate and encourage great candidates for office at every level -   by developing and backing strong candidates for state and local office.  And by recruiting great candidates at the Federal level.
 
In 2016 we are likely to be blessed with the opportunity to elect the first woman President of the United States.  That will ignite women voters – and young voters, the same way that the opportunity to elect the first African American President ignited African American and young voters in 2008 and 2012.
 
And in the end, when those candidates actually take office, we have to help them deliver – to get stuff done.  Voters don’t just want talk.  They want action.  And if they don’t get it from Democrats many will try the other side.
 
That’s why it is so important that even though many Progressives disagree with the President on his trade proposals, we work like crazy to support President Obama’s Executive Actions on the many issues where we have consensus -- like overtime pay, sentencing reform, family and medical leave, immigration reform, policing, climate change, the minimum wage for Federal Contractors, and the Iran nuclear deal.
 
There are obstacles in the road.  But fundamentally, we have arrived at a potentially progressive moment in America – a moment when a true progressive consensus has begun to form in the Democratic Party and among the voters.   If we take advantage of that moment, we could look back at 2016 not as some showdown between wings of the Democratic coalition, but as a progressive tipping point in American history.

 
Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist, and author of the book:  Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win, available on Amazon.com. He is a partner in Democracy Partners and a Senior Strategist for Americans United for Change. Follow him on Twitter @rbcreamer.
 

Browse articles by author

More Current Affairs

Mar 3rd 2022
EXTRACT: "Although Ukraine’s armed forces are outnumbered by those of Russian President Vladimir Putin invading our country, we take heart from the growing support we are receiving from friends abroad. Nobody should forget that this is not just an unprovoked invasion of Ukraine; it is an assault on the free world. ---- Putin has been at war with the free world for decades. "
Mar 2nd 2022
EXTRACT: "Moreover, with China sharing the Kremlin’s interest in containing the advance of liberal democracy around the world, Putin could count on the Chinese to provide an additional economic lifeline by purchasing Russian gas. But this new relationship will not be costless. As the world continues to divide into separate technological and economic blocs, Russia will become even more dependent on China, implying a loss of strategic autonomy. Russia may have a powerful military; but with a GDP similar to that of Spain and Italy, it is far from being an economic power."
Mar 1st 2022
EXTRACT: "The financial measures just announced against Russia are unprecedented for a country of its size. This of course means it’s impossible to predict exactly how their impacts will reverberate around the Russian – and global – economy. And we still need to see the exact details of the plan. But on their face they threaten the collapse of the Russian ruble, a run on Russian banks, hyperinflation, a sharp recession and high levels of unemployment in Russia, as well as turmoil in international financial markets."
Feb 26th 2022
EXTRACT: "Putin apparently assumes that China will back him. But while he launched the invasion just weeks after concluding something akin to an alliance agreement with Xi in Beijing, Chinese officials’ reactions have been very distant with calls for “restraint.” Given Putin’s near-total reliance on China for support in challenging the US-led international order, lying to Xi would have no political or strategic advantage. That is what is so worrying: Putin no longer seems capable of the calculations that are supposed to guide a leader’s decision-making. Far from an equal partner, Russia is now on track to become a kind of Chinese vassal state."
Feb 25th 2022
EXTRACTS: "Russia’s ascent to global power in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries resulted in numerous tragedies not only for the neighbors it subjugated and gradually absorbed, but also for its own people. China’s current leaders, in particular, should be mindful of this history, considering that imperial Russia seized more territory from China than from anyone else." ----- "Putin is taking Russia hurtling back toward the nineteenth century, in search of past greatness, whereas China is forging ahead to become the defining superpower of the twenty-first century. While China has achieved unprecedentedly rapid economic and technological modernization, Putin has been pouring Russia’s energy-export revenues into the military, once again cheating the Russian people out of their future."
Feb 18th 2022
EXTRACT: "........ Xi did what was needed to lock Russia into a vassal-like dependency on China. And Putin chose to walk straight into his trap, thinking that partnership with Xi would help him in his confrontation with the West. ---- What could be better for China than a Russian economy completely cut off from the West? All the natural gas that does not flow westward to Europe could flow eastward to an energy-hungry China. All Siberia’s mineral wealth, which Russia has required Western capital and expertise to exploit, would be available only to China, as would major new infrastructure projects in Russia." ---- "Putin seems to be ignoring that China’s leaders and people view Russia as a corrupt country which stole more Chinese territory in the nineteenth century than any other."
Feb 14th 2022
EXTRACT: "Russia’s large-scale military mobilization on Ukraine’s border has grim historic precedents. But should the Kremlin pull the trigger, it will encounter a hazard that no invading army has ever faced before: 15 nuclear power reactors, which generate roughly 50% of Ukraine’s energy needs at four sites. The reactors present a daunting specter. If struck, the installations could effectively become radiological mines. And Russia itself would be a victim of the ensuing wind-borne radioactive debris. Given the vulnerability of Ukraine’s nuclear reactors and the human and environmental devastation that would follow if combat were to damage them, Russian President Vladimir Putin should think again about whether Ukraine is worth a war."
Feb 11th 2022
EXTRACT: "Yet Putin gives Xi precisely what he wants: a partner who can destabilize the Western alliance and deflect America’s strategic focus away from its China containment strategy. From Xi’s perspective, that leaves the door wide open for China’s ascendancy to great-power status, realizing the promise of national rejuvenation set forth in Xi’s cherished “China Dream.” "
Feb 10th 2022
EXTRACTS: "It has become abundantly clear that the United States has an inflation problem. What is not yet clear is how big the problem will turn out to be and how long it will last. ---- "Alarmed observers point to parallels with the 1970s, when commodity prices shot up,..." ------ "Today, in contrast, inflation expectations remain firmly anchored. The Michigan Survey of Consumers shows that respondents expect inflation to approach 5% over the coming year, before falling back to just above 2% in the subsequent four years. The inflation rate implicit in the price of five-year inflation-indexed Treasury securities shows basically the same thing: inflation averaging 2.8% over the next five years."
Jan 26th 2022
EXTRACT: "Over the past three decades, bonds have offered a negative overall yearly return only a few times. The decline of inflation rates from double-digit levels to very low single digits produced a long bull market in bonds; yields fell and returns on bonds were highly positive as their price rose. The past 30 years thus have contrasted sharply with the stagflationary 1970s, when bond yields skyrocketed alongside higher inflation, leading to massive market losses for bonds."
Jan 26th 2022
EXTRACT: "The idea of a conventional force attack by Russia on Poland, the Baltic or Black Sea states is fanciful. But it is rendered near impossible in the minds of the Kremlin leadership by the sure knowledge that Nato would take a stand. In response to events around Ukraine, the credibility of the alliance is being affirmed through a set of coordinated measures...." ---- "The forces Moscow has assembled on Ukraine’s borders are clearly intended to intimidate the government in Kyiv. But as the weeks drag on Russia may be losing the military advantage. It has already forfeited the element of surprise essential for a swift land grab (as was used during the seizure of Crimea in 2014)."
Jan 25th 2022
EXTRACT: "By now, it is passé to warn that the Fed is “behind the curve.” In fact, the Fed is so far behind that it can’t even see the curve. Its dot plots, not only for this year but also for 2023 and 2024, don’t do justice to the extent of monetary tightening that most likely will be required as the Fed scrambles to bring inflation back under control. In the meantime, financial markets are in for a very rude awakening."
Jan 25th 2022
EXTRACT: "As it is, Germany has made strides in getting off coal. Coal provided half of power production in 2000, and is now down to about a little over a quarter. And Germany has done more to put in renewables, with its “Energiewende” or Energy Switch, than any other large industrialized nation. The new Social Democratic government, which is in coalition with the Greens, plans to put enormous amounts of new renewables in every year until 2030, projecting that by that date, 80 percent of Germany’s power will come from renewables."
Jan 21st 2022
EXTRACTS: "The fear is that Moscow is backing itself into a diplomatic corner where the use of force is its only way to remain credible." ----- "The Ukrainian population has also been mobilizing in support of the troops since the seizure of Crimea and the war in Donbas. And according to a poll taken in December 2021 by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, 58% of Ukrainian men and almost 13% of women declared that they are ready to take up arms. A further 17% and 25% more said they would resist through other means. In what would be a classic case of asymmetrical warfare, resistance from Ukraine’s population could therefore prove a serious thorn in Moscow’s side."
Jan 12th 2022
EXTRACTS: "While at the time of writing, the outcome of Djokovic’s visa troubles was uncertain, the double standard of rules raises a much bigger question about the philosophy of law: can the application of a rule be so unfair that we have no valid reason to follow it?" ------ "......a rule that doesn’t treat like cases alike can’t be a law at all. This is because a key requirement of a legal system is that it needs to be stable, which means that people need to know what the law is and when it applies. If a rule doesn’t treat everyone equally, then it does the opposite and increases doubt and uncertainty about what the law even is. And if enough rules exist that create uncertainty about what the law is and when it applies, the system will collapse. A rule that undermines a legal system in this way can’t really be law at all, and legal officials shouldn’t create or uphold them."
Jan 9th 2022
EXTRACT: "Novak Djokovic, the world’s top-ranking tennis player, has just been granted a medical exemption to take part in the Australian Open. Djokovic, who has won the event nine times (one more victory would give him a record-breaking 21 major titles), refused to show proof of vaccination, which is required to enter Australia. “I will not reveal my status whether I have been vaccinated or not,” he told Blic, a Serbian daily, calling it “a private matter and an inappropriate inquiry.” The family of Dale Weeks, who died last month at the age of 78, would disagree. Weeks was a patient at a small hospital in rural Iowa, being treated for sepsis. The hospital sought to transfer him to a larger hospital where he could have surgery, but a surge in COVID-19 patients, almost all of them unvaccinated, meant that there were no spare beds. It took 15 days for Weeks to obtain a transfer, and by then, it was too late."
Jan 9th 2022
EXTRACT: "The protests that erupted across Kazakhstan on January 2 quickly turned into riots in all of the country’s major cities. What do the protesters want, and what will be the outcome of the country’s most severe civil unrest since independence in 1991? "
Jan 7th 2022
EXTRACT: ".....one wonders how Chinese President Xi Jinping views Russia’s intervention in Kazakhstan, which shares a nearly 1,800-kilometer (1,120-mile) border with China, especially in light of Putin’s earlier comments diminishing the history of Kazakhstan’s independent statehood. (He has shown similar contempt for the independence of Belarus, the Baltic states, and Ukraine.)"
Jan 7th 2022
EXTRACT: "The problem with history as propaganda is not that it makes people feel good or bad, but that it creates perpetual enemies – and thus the perpetual risk of wars."
Jan 5th 2022
EXTRACT: ".....a scenario in which Trump (or one of his allies) is designated president by the House of Representatives after the 2024 election probably belongs in the realm of political-thriller fiction.  Now consider the unlikely event that Trump were nominated and won a clear Electoral College or popular-vote majority in 2024. Rather than establish the white-nationalist dictatorship of progressive nightmares, an elderly second-term Trump would most likely be an even more ineffectual figurehead in a party dominated by conventional Republicans than he was in his first four years. If Italian democracy could survive three terms of Silvio Berlusconi as prime minister, American democracy can survive two terms of Trump. None of this is to suggest that American democracy is not under threat. Populist demagogues like Trump are symptoms of a disease in the body politic. The real threat to American democracy is the disconnect between what the bipartisan US political establishment promises and what it delivers. This problem predates Trump by decades and helps to explain his rise. "